1. American
philosopher, ethnobotanist, lecturer, and author Terrence McKenna,
Born November 16, 1946 Paonia, Colorado, U.S.
Died April
3, 2000 (aged 53) San Rafael, California, U.S.
“It's only going to get weirder. The level of contradiction is
going to rise excruciatingly, even beyond the excruciating present
levels of contradiction. So, I think it's just going to get weirder
and weirder, and weirder, and finally it's going to be so weird that
people are going to have to talk about how weird it is. (...) So,
between now and 2012, the next 14 years, I look for: the invention of
artificial life, the cloning of human beings, possible contact with
extraterrestrials, possible human immortality, and at the same time,
appalling acts of brutality, genocide, race baiting, famine,
starvation; because the systems which are in place to keep the world
sane are utterly inadequate to the forces that have been unleashed.
(…) The mushroom said to me once, it said: "This is what it's
like when a species prepares to depart for the stars." You don't
depart for the stars under calm and orderly conditions; it's a fire
in a madhouse, and that's what we have, the fire in the madhouse at
the end of time. This is what it's like when a species prepares to
move on to the next dimension. The entire destiny of all life on the
planet is tied up in this.” - Terrence McKenna, 1998.
2. Top 10
Disturbing Signs CERN May Have Ripped Through Reality | More Demons
Found In The CERN Beams!
* The
Deadliest country no one wants to report truthfully about is
Ethiopia.
* Since the beginning of the genocidal Jihad in the Northern
Ethiopian regions of Tigray, Amhara and Afar in November 2020 till
today:
❖ – 1.5
Million Orthodox Christians were brutally Massacred
❖ – 200.000
Orthodox Christian Women, children and nuns were Raped and abused
❖ – Over a
Million Ethiopians were forced to migrate to other countries
❖ – 4.4
million internally displaced people severely impacted by conflict,
hostilities and climate shocks
❖ – Over a
Million female Ethiopian slaves were sold to Arab countries
❖ – 20
million Ethiopian are forced to experience food insecurity
by the fascist Islamo-Protestant, Oromo army of the prosperity gospel
heretic PM Abiy Ahmed Ali and his UN, Arab, Israeli, Turkish,
Iranian, European, American, Russian, Ukrainian, African allies.
🔥 The
Wars in Tigray, Ethiopia and Ukraine showed us:
😈
United by their
Illuminist-Luciferian-Masonic-Satanist agendas The following
Edomite-Ishmaelite nations, entities, bodies and individuals are
waging Jihad against the ancient Christian nation of Axumite Ethiopia
– as they all actively and openly assist, empower and protect, the
genocidal fascist Oromo Islamic regime of evil Abiy Ahmed Ali:
☆
The United Nations
☆
The World Health Organization
☆
António Guterres
☆
Tedros Adhanom
☆
Klaus
Schwab
🔥
CERN
🔥
TECH LUMINARIES
🔥 BILL GATES
🔥 ELON MUSK
(STARLINK)
🔥 PETER THIEL
(PALANTIR)
🔥
SAM ALTMAN(OpenAI)
☆
The European Union
☆
The African Union
☆
The United States, Canada &
Cuba
☆
Presidents Biden & Trump
☆
Russia
☆
Ukraine
☆
China
☆ Israel
☆ Iran
☆ Arab
States / Arab League /UAE
☆
Egypt
☆ Turkey
☆ Azerbaijan
☆
Southern Ethiopians
☆
Amharas
☆
Galla-Oromos
☆
Eritrea
☆
Djibouti
☆
Kenya
☆ South
Africa
☆ Nigeria
☆
Sudan
☆
Somalia
☆
Pakistan
☆
India
☆
Amnesty International
☆
Human Rights Watch
☆
World Food Program (2020 Nobel
Peace Laureate)
☆
The Nobel Prize Committee
🔥 THE WORLD
ECONOMIC FORUM
☆
The World Bank &
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
☆
The International Criminal Court
(ICC)
☆
The Atheists and Animists
☆
The Muslims
☆
The Protestants
☆
The Sodomites
☆
Mainstream Media
☆
Social Medias like Facebook,
YouTube, Tic Tok
☆
TPLF
💭
Even those nations that are one
another enemies, like: 'Israel vs Iran', 'Russia + China vs Ukraine +
The West', 'Egypt + Sudan vs Iran + Turkey', 'India vs Pakistan' have
now become friends – as they are all united in the anti-Christian,
anti-Zionist-Ethiopia-Conspiracy. This has never ever happened
before, it is a very curios phenomenon – a strange unique
appearance in world history.
We saw them marching
in formation on Axum Zion, didn't we?! And today, aren't they
plundering the gold and silver of Axumite Ethiopia through the
Babylonian Arab Emirates?
“And he will pitch his
royal tent between the sea and the glorious holy mountain”
Isn't the place between
the sea (Mediterranean) and the glorious holy mountain (Mount
Moriah/Mount Zion) the 'Gaza' that the Antichrists, Dollar
Trump, Jared Kushner, Elon Musk and Peter Thiel,
want to build it and make their Antichrist
center today?
'Gaza' is the territory of
the Ethiopians!
📦 Zion's
Captivity, Zion's Ark;
In
1 Samuel 5:6: “The hand of the LORD was heavy against the
people of Ashdod, and he terrified and afflicted them with tumors,
both Ashdod and its territory. When they brought The
Ark of The Covenant to Ashkelon, he struck
the Ashkelonites with boils. And their land was infested with rats.
There was a great outcry and a great cry. When they saw that The
Ark of The Covenant had brought great
plagues upon the Philistines, the anger of the Lord was kindled
against them. So the five kings of the Philistines (Ashdod, Ashkelon,
Ekron, Gath, and Gaza) consulted with the idolatrous priests and the
diviners, saying, “They said, “If you send away the ark of the
God of Israel, do not send it empty, but by all means return him a
guilt offering. Then you will be healed, and it will be known to you
why his hand does not turn away from you.” (1 Sam. 6:3)
They agreed to this and
made five golden mice and five golden calves, according to the five
provinces of the Philistines. They tied two unyoked donkeys to the
cart and loaded TheArk
of The Covenant with the gold that was
prepared. They pulled the cart out of the Philistines and went to
Beth Shemesh. When the cart came to the field of Joshua the Beth
Shemeshite, it stopped there. When the people of that place brought
down the Ark and the box in which the gold
was, seventy men were killed because they had seen The
Ark of God. The people of Kiriath Jeari
took The Ark of
The Covenant to the house of Amminadab, and
Eleazar the son of Amminadab was appointed to minister to the ark.
The ark of Zion remained there for twenty years.
😇 The evangelist
Saint Philip went down to Gaza and baptized the Ethiopian eunuch
Bacchus (Acts 8:26:40).
❖[Daniel 11:40-45]❖
“At the time of the end,
the king of the south shall attack him, but the king of the north
shall rush upon him like a whirlwind, with chariots and horsemen, and
with many ships. And he shall come into countries and shall overflow
and pass through. He shall come into the glorious land. And tens of
thousands shall fall, but these shall be delivered out of his hand:
Edom and Moab and the main part of the Ammonites. He shall stretch
out his hand against the countries, and the land of Egypt shall not
escape. He shall become ruler of the treasures of gold and of silver,
and all the precious things of Egypt, and the Libyans and the
Ethiopians shall follow in his train. But
news from the east and the north shall alarm him, and he shall go out
with great fury to destroy and devote many to destruction. And he
shall pitch his palatial tents between the sea and the glorious holy
mountain. Yet he shall come to his end, with none to help him.”
🛑 Donald Trump's
Trouble is Linked to The Biblical Ark of The Covenant and Ethiopia
Each time US President
Donald Trump raises the issue of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance
Dam/GERD, we are reminded of a passage from
his book, “The
Art of the Deal”, in which he advises novice investors to
“maximize your options.”
Trump argues that even the
most promising deals tend to fail, so success requires preparing at
least half a dozen fallback strategies—because, as he puts it,
anything is possible.
Trump addressed
the Renaissance Dam dispute for the fourth
time in less than a month. Reiterating his concern that the dam poses
a significant threat to Egypt’s water security, he blamed the
previous Democratic administration for having financed and enabled
the project. He claimed coordination with Cairo was underway and
spoke vaguely of a “pretty long-term” solution—without
providing further details.
The Nile and
Gaza: A transactional bargain?
Against this
backdrop, it is not unreasonable to connect Trump’s comments on the
dam to broader regional developments—most notably, Gaza. The issue
had not featured on his public agenda during his second term until it
became relevant to a potential ceasefire deal between Israel and
Iran. That moment was soon followed by Israeli PM Benjamin
Netanyahu’s visit to Washington, the public resurfacing of
proposals for a so-called humanitarian city, and renewed media
advocacy from pro-Israel outlets promoting longstanding ideas to
either relocate the Palestinian population of Gaza into Egypt’s
Sinai Peninsula or place the territory under Egyptian control.
Trump appeared
to be laying the groundwork for a perilous trade-off: Nile water
security in exchange for Egypt’s complicity—whether in the form
of accepting the displacement of Palestinians into Sinai, assuming
administrative control over Gaza, or, at a minimum, becoming further
entangled in a resolution favorable to Netanyahu.
Such a
resolution would aim to eliminate resistance, subdue Gaza
permanently, or facilitate its incremental absorption by Israel,
mirroring developments in the West Bank. These scenarios, while
alarming, remain within the realm of political imagination embraced
by Israel’s most influential supporters.
Trump’s
recent posture is not an aberration—it reflects the worldview
captured in his book: plan for success across multiple fronts,
knowing that only some options will come to fruition.
A
Longstanding position
To understand
Trump’s stance, it is important to recall his consistent opposition
to the dam project during his first term. In 2020, as Ethiopia
commenced its first unilateral filling of the dam, Trump ordered a
reduction of $130 million in US aid to Addis Ababa. This was viewed
as a rare instance of Washington penalizing an African state over
Nile-related negotiations.
Trump’s
interest in African affairs had previously seemed minimal. Thus, his
open warning shortly afterwards was all the more surprising. Speaking
publicly about Sudan’s prospective normalization with Israel, Trump
remarked—almost in passing—that “Egypt will end up blowing up
the dam,” adding “I said it and I say it loud and clear …
they’ll blow up that dam. And they have to do something.”
It’s highly
probable that Trump solely blamed Addis Ababa for the failure of the
Washington negotiations. At the time, Trump was personally overseeing
the US-brokered negotiations, with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin
and World Bank officials taking part. Ethiopia eventually withdrew,
accusing the US of abandoning its role as mediator and aligning with
Egypt’s legal and diplomatic framing of the dispute.
What more Trump
could have done to influence Ethiopia remains unclear. His
administration’s aggressive stance only reinforced Ethiopian
skepticism, validating a nationalist narrative that painted US
involvement as neocolonial interference. In Addis Ababa’s telling,
historical water rights treaties—dating back to the colonial
era—were skewed in favor of Egypt and must now be corrected.
Such arguments
have gained traction in Western academic and policy circles,
including in the US and Europe. They were also reflected in the Biden
administration’s more conciliatory approach. Upon taking office,
Biden lifted the aid freeze, and disengaged from the dam
negotiations, refocusing instead on Ethiopia’s civil war in Tigray.
His administration issued only vague diplomatic statements, and Egypt
had to turn to the failed African Union–led mediation.
The net result
was to create space for Ethiopia to complete construction and
successive fillings of the dam, effectively removing international
constraints.
A broader
agenda?
When Trump
claims that the US funded the project, he is not referring to direct
financial support. Rather, he is pointing to a broader context: the
Biden administration’s disengagement and its implicit signaling
that the US would not obstruct Ethiopia’s efforts. Since Egypt’s
appeal to the UN Security Council in July 2021, the diplomatic track
has cooled. The genocidal war against Christians of Northern Ethiopia
(Tigray) that lasted for two years absorbed most US attention, and
Egypt found itself navigating the crisis alone.
But Trump’s
comments may also reflect deeper ambitions. One plausible
interpretation is that he is using the dam dispute as leverage in
other negotiations, such as his broader Middle East policy, or his
desire to present himself once again as a candidate for the Nobel
Peace Prize.
The
redirection of Nile waters to Israel: The Nile-to-Israel pipeline:
From fantasy to folly
The idea of
diverting Nile water to Israel is not a recent invention. In 1903,
during a visit to Egypt, Theodor Herzl proposed to the British
colonial authorities and the government of Khedive Abbas Helmy II the
creation of a Jewish homeland in northern Sinai, to be designated
“The Egyptian Province of Judea,” under a 99-year concession.
This proposal
included full sovereign rights for Herzl over the designated
territory, with future negotiations anticipated regarding the
delivery of Nile water—a prospect that Egypt rejected outright on
the grounds that it would entail altering the natural course of the
river.
The late
renowned journalist Kamel Zoheiry devoted a chapter of his book The
Nile in Danger to documenting this episode.
The concept resurfaced
during the early phase of Egyptian-Israeli normalization. In
September 1979, during a visit to Haifa, President Anwar Sadat
reportedly told Begin, “Why not send you some fresh water to the
Negev? You are good neighbors.” Israeli and American newspapers
interpreted the remark as a breakthrough. But the comment was omitted
from Egyptian coverage.
The alarm only truly
sounded when Egypt began digging the Peace Canal in November 1979. A
month later, in December, October magazine published a report titled
“The New Zamzam Project,” citing Sadat’s directives to deliver
Nile water to Jerusalem, to be accessible to worshipers visiting the
Al-Aqsa Mosque, the Dome of the Rock, the Church of the Holy
Sepulchre, and the Western Wall.
He was quoted as saying,
“We will make this water a contribution from the Egyptian people,
in the name of hundreds of millions of Muslims, in commemoration of
the peace initiative.”
The backlash was immediate
and fierce. Parliamentarians, newspapers, and political parties
condemned the idea. Dr. Naemat Ahmed Fouad, writing in Al-Shaab
newspaper, called it “a matter of life and death,” warning
against “the cultivation and prosperity of the Negev, the
qualitative imbalance, the entrenchment of Israel and its expansion
towards Sinai and into Arab oil locations, and the encirclement of
Egypt and Saudi Arabia.”
Israel expressed
support for increased Nile water shares from Ethiopia. Widely viewed
MBC anchor Amr Adib said in his show “The
Story” that if the Israelis swore
that they have nothing to do with the Nile water, he would not
believe them. However, while the prevailing tone in Cairo is to
remain suspicious of Israel when it comes to the Nile, former
Egyptian diplomat and current president of Alexandria Library Mustafa
el-Feki nevertheless expressed a different opinion, arguing
instead that Cairo should utilize its regional influence to open
direct channels with Israel and seek assistance to maximize leverage
over Ethiopia.
Historically,
Egyptian elite circles have been obsessed with the idea that Israel
is trying to “steal” the Nile water. Proponents of this narrative
argue the Torah identifies Israel’s correct borders as between the
Nile River and the Euphrates River. A popular, but unsubstantiated
justification for this argument claims the entrance to the Knesset
bears an inscription with this specific Torah excerpt. In 2021, a
report by General Hamdy al-Batran published
by Dostor newspaper explained that Israeli interest in the Nile can
be linked back to 1903, when Theodore Herzl proposed to the British
government a plan for the transferal of water from the Nile through
Suez Canal and then into Palestine.
Notably, there was
an offer made by President Anwar Sadat to the Israelis back during
1979 talks when Sadat suggested that Egypt “pipe fresh water from
the Nile River across the Sinai Peninsula to the Negev Desert”,
according to this archived Washington
Post article. Indeed, this issue has
proven to crop up periodically as former President Hosni Mubarak
grappled with supposed Israeli interest in the Nile. In 1997, during
the opening ceremony of the El Salam Canal, Mubarak announced
it is purely an Egyptian project and water is too scarce to be shared
with others. It was an indirect answer to his domestic critics who
were claiming that he would sell the Nile water to Israel through the
Sinai based project.
Setting aside
Israeli interests, Trump may see the GERD dispute as yet another
opportunity to bolster his case for a Nobel Peace Prize, or as a
pressure point to extract quick diplomatic wins for his
administration. He may also view it as a convenient flashpoint for
stirring tensions within the BRICS bloc, to which both Egypt and
Ethiopia belong, particularly amid concerns about their potential
future cooperation in ways that could diminish US influence in favor
of China.
