👹 Azerbaijani President
Ilham Aliyev's security guards assaulted protesters on Pennsylvania
Avenue in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, February 19
👹 The Aliyevs took part
in the conference, held from 13–15 February.
Azerbaijani Vice President
Mehriban Aliyeva, wife of President Ilham Aliyev, has insulted
journalist Emin Huseynov at the Munich Security Conference. Huseynov
claims that Aliyev’s security detail has also prevented him from
asking the president questions during the conference.
On 14 February, Huseynov, who
lives in exile in Switzerland, tried several times to ask Aliyev a
number of questions outside the conference hall. The Azerbaijani
president answered questions from pro-government journalists, but
ignored him.
Huseynov claims that Aliyev’s
security detail appeared to recognise him, and did not allow him to
remain with other journalists. He was forcibly pushed back several
times, but still tried to ask Aliyev about his crackdown on political
opponents in Azerbaijan. Huseynov also asked Aliyev to answer
questions from independent media.
In the video, Aliyev is seen
turning to Huseynov and saying: ‘there is no independent media in
the world’.
Huseynov claimed that Aliyev’s
bodyguards did not allow him to leave until the president’s
departure.
Huseynov shared a separate video
on 15 February showing his interaction with Aliyeva as she was
leaving the conference hall. In the video, Huseynov asks Aliyeva
about the political situation in Azerbaijan. She stops, and asks
Huseynov to identify himself. After he does, she insults Huseynov,
saying that he had hid in the Swiss Embassy in Baku dressed as a
woman.
❖ "Do not have Jesus
Christ on your lips, and the world in your heart" Saint Ignatius
of Antioch
👉 Courtesy:Zerohedge.com,
by Tyler Durden, Thursday, Dec 25, 2025
Authored by John & Nisha
Whitehead via The Rurtherford Institute,
“When the song of the angels
is stilled, when the star in the sky is gone, when the kings and
princes are home, when the shepherds are back with their flocks, the
work of Christmas begins: to find the lost, to heal the broken, to
feed the hungry, to release the prisoner, to rebuild the nations, to
bring peace among the people, to make music in the heart.”—Howard
Thurman, theologian and civil rights activist
Every Christmas, Christians
celebrate the birth of a child born into oppression—an occupied
land, a climate of political fear, and a government quick to crush
anything that threatened its authority.
Two thousand years later, the
parallels are unmistakable.
If Jesus were born in modern
America, under a government obsessed with surveillance, crackdowns on
undocumented immigrants, religious nationalism, and absolute
obedience to a head-of-state rather than the rule of law, would he
survive long enough to preach about love, forgiveness and salvation?
Would his message of peace, mercy, and resistance to empire be
branded as extremism?
As familiar as the Christmas
story of the baby born in a manger might be, it is also a cautionary
tale for our age.
The Roman Empire, a police state
in its own right, had ordered that a census be conducted. Joseph and
his pregnant wife Mary traveled to the little town of Bethlehem so
that they could be counted. There being no room for the couple at any
of the inns, they stayed in a stable (a barn), where Mary gave birth
to a baby boy, Jesus. Warned that the government planned to kill the
baby, Jesus’ family fled with him to Egypt until it was safe to
return to their native land.
Yet what if Jesus had been born
2,000 years later?
What if, instead of being born
into the Roman police state, Jesus had been born at this moment in
time? What kind of reception would Jesus and his family be given?
Would we recognize the Christ child’s humanity, let alone his
divinity? Would we treat him any differently than he was treated by
the Roman Empire? If his family were forced to flee violence in their
native country and sought refuge and asylum within our borders, what
sanctuary would we offer them?
A singular number of churches
across the country have asked those very questions in recent years,
and their conclusions were depicted with unnerving accuracy by
nativity scenes in which Jesus and his family are separated,
segregated and caged in individual chain-link pens, topped by barbed
wire fencing.
Those nativity scenes were a
pointed attempt to remind the modern world that the narrative about
the birth of Jesus is one that speaks on multiple fronts to a world
that has allowed the life, teachings and crucifixion of Jesus to be
drowned out by partisan politics, secularism, materialism and war,
all driven by a manipulative shadow government called the Deep State.
The modern-day church has
largely shied away from applying Jesus’ teachings to modern
problems such as war, poverty, immigration, etc., but thankfully
there have been individuals throughout history who ask themselves and
the world: what would Jesus do?
What would Jesus—the baby born
in Bethlehem who grew into an itinerant preacher and revolutionary
activist, who not only died challenging the police state of his day
(namely, the Roman Empire) but spent his adult life speaking truth to
power, challenging the status quo of his day, and pushing back
against the abuses of the Roman Empire—do about the injustices of
our modern age?
Dietrich Bonhoeffer asked
himself what Jesus would have done about the horrors perpetrated by
Hitler and his assassins. The answer: Bonhoeffer was executed by
Hitler for attempting to undermine the tyranny at the heart of Nazi
Germany.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn asked
himself what Jesus would have done about the soul-destroying gulags
and labor camps of the Soviet Union. The answer: Solzhenitsyn found
his voice and used it to speak out about government oppression and
brutality.
Martin Luther King Jr. asked
himself what Jesus would have done about America’s warmongering.
The answer: declaring “my conscience leaves me no other choice,”
King risked widespread condemnation as well as his life when he
publicly opposed the Vietnam War on moral and economic grounds.
Their lives make clear that the
question “What would Jesus do?” is never abstract. It is always
political, always dangerous, and always costly.
Even now, there remains a
disconnect in the modern church between the teachings of Christ and
the suffering of what Jesus in Matthew 25 refers to as the “least
of these.”
Yet this is not a theological
gray area: Jesus was unequivocal about his views on many things, not
the least of which was charity, compassion, war, tyranny and love.
After all, Jesus—the revered
preacher, teacher, radical and prophet—was born into a police state
not unlike the growing menace of the American police state.
Jesus was not born into comfort
or security. He was born poor, without shelter, in an occupied land
ruled by force and fear, under the watchful eye of a government
obsessed with control, compliance, and the elimination of perceived
threats. His parents were politically powerless. His birthplace was
makeshift. His earliest days were shaped by fear of state violence.
Herod’s response to the news
of the Messiah’s birth was not humility or reflection, but
paranoia. Threatened by the mere possibility of a rival authority,
Herod turned to brute force. The lesson is timeless: this is how
tyranny operates. Unchecked power, when gripped by insecurity, will
always seek to eliminate dissent rather than allow its own corruption
to be confronted.
Modern governments, including
our own, cloaked in the language of security and “law and order,”
behave no differently. Any challenge to centralized power is treated
as a threat to be neutralized. In such an environment, speaking truth
to power is dangerous. Challenging imperial authority invites
retaliation.
From the moment of his birth,
Jesus represented a threat—not because he wielded violence or
political power, but because his life and message exposed the moral
bankruptcy of empire and offered an alternative rooted in justice,
mercy, and truth.
When Jesus grew up, he had
powerful, profound things to say—things that would change how we
view people, things that challenged everything empire stood for.
“Blessed are the merciful,” “Blessed are the peacemakers,”
and “Love your enemies” are just a few examples of his most
profound and revolutionary teachings.
When confronted by those in
authority, Jesus did not shy away from speaking truth to power.
Indeed, his teachings undermined the political and religious
establishment of his day. It cost him his life. He was eventually
crucified as a warning to others not to challenge the powers-that-be.
Can you imagine what Jesus’
life would have been like if, instead of being born into the Roman
police state, he had been born and raised in the American police
state?
Consider the following if you
will.
Had Jesus been born in the era
of the American police state, his parents would not have traveled to
Bethlehem for a census. Instead, they would have been entered into a
vast web of government databases—flagged, categorized, scored, and
assessed by algorithms they could neither see nor challenge. What
passes for a census today is no longer a simple headcount, but rather
part of a data-harvesting regime that feeds artificial intelligence
systems, predictive policing programs, immigration enforcement, and
national security watchlists.
Instead of being born in a
manger, Jesus might have been born at home. Rather than wise men and
shepherds bringing gifts, however, the baby’s parents might have
been forced to ward off visits from state social workers intent on
prosecuting them for the home birth.
Had Jesus been born in a
hospital, his blood and DNA would have been taken without his
parents’ knowledge or consent and entered into a government
biobank. While most states require newborn screening, a growing
number are holding onto that genetic material long-term for research,
analysis and purposes yet to be disclosed.
Had Jesus’ parents been
undocumented immigrants, they and their newborn child might have been
swept up in an early-morning ICE raid, detained without meaningful
due process, processed through a profit-driven, private prison, and
deported in the dead of night to a detention camp in a third-world
country.
From the time he was old enough
to attend school, Jesus would have been drilled in lessons of
compliance and obedience to government authorities, while learning
little—if anything—about his own rights. Had he been daring
enough to speak out against injustice while still in school, he might
have found himself tasered or beaten by a school resource officer, or
at the very least suspended under a school zero tolerance policy that
punishes minor infractions as harshly as more serious offenses.
Had Jesus disappeared for a few
hours let alone days as a 12-year-old, his parents would have been
handcuffed, arrested and jailed for parental negligence. Parents
across the country have been arrested for far less “offenses”
such as allowing their children to walk to the park unaccompanied and
play in their front yard alone.
Rather than disappearing from
the history books from his early teenaged years to adulthood, Jesus’
movements and personal data—including his biometrics—would have
been documented, tracked, monitored and filed by governmental
agencies and corporations such as Google and Microsoft. Incredibly,
95 percent of school districts share their student records with
outside companies that are contracted to manage data, which they then
use to market products to us.
From the moment Jesus made
contact with an “extremist” such as John the Baptist, he would
have been flagged for surveillance because of his association with a
prominent activist, peaceful or otherwise. Since 9/11, the FBI has
actively carried out surveillance and intelligence-gathering
operations on a broad range of activist groups, from animal rights
groups to poverty relief, anti-war groups and other such “extremist”
organizations.
Jesus’ anti-government views
would certainly have resulted in him being labeled a domestic
extremist. Law enforcement agencies are being trained to recognize
signs of anti-government extremism during interactions with potential
extremists who share a “belief in the approaching collapse of
government and the economy.”
While traveling from community
to community, Jesus might have been reported to government officials
as “suspicious” under the Department of Homeland Security’s
“See Something, Say Something” programs. Many states are
providing individuals with phone apps that allow them to take photos
of suspicious activity and report them to their state Intelligence
Center, where they are reviewed and forwarded to law-enforcement
agencies.
Rather than being permitted to
live as an itinerant preacher, Jesus might have found himself
threatened with arrest for daring to live off the grid or sleeping
outside. In fact, the number of cities that have resorted to
criminalizing homelessness by enacting bans on camping, sleeping in
vehicles, loitering and begging in public has doubled.
Jesus’ teachings—his refusal
to pledge allegiance to empire, his warnings about wealth and power,
his insistence that obedience to God sometimes requires resistance to
unjust authority—would almost certainly be interpreted today as
signs of ideological extremism. In an age when dissent is
increasingly framed as a threat to public order, Jesus would not need
to commit violence to be labeled dangerous. His words alone would
suffice.
Viewed by the government as a
dissident and a potential threat to its power, Jesus might have had
government spies planted among his followers to monitor his
activities, report on his movements, and entrap him into breaking the
law. Such Judases today—called informants—often receive hefty
paychecks from the government for their treachery.
Had Jesus used the internet to
spread his radical message of peace and love, he might have found his
blog posts infiltrated by government spies attempting to undermine
his integrity, discredit him or plant incriminating information
online about him. At the very least, he would have had his website
hacked and his email monitored.
Had Jesus attempted to feed
large crowds of people, he would have been threatened with arrest for
violating various ordinances prohibiting the distribution of food
without a permit.
Had Jesus spoken publicly about
his forty days in the wilderness, his visions, or his confrontations
with evil, he might have been labeled mentally ill and subjected to
an involuntary psychiatric hold—detained not for what he had done,
but for what authorities feared he might do. Increasingly,
expressions of distress, spiritual conviction, or nonconformity are
pathologized and treated as grounds for confinement, especially when
paired with homelessness or poverty.
Without a doubt, had Jesus
attempted to overturn tables in a Jewish temple and rage against the
materialism of religious institutions, he would have been charged
with a hate crime. More than 45 states and the federal government
have hate crime laws on the books.
Had anyone reported Jesus to the
police as being potentially dangerous, he might have found himself
confronted—and killed—by police officers for whom any perceived
act of non-compliance (a twitch, a question, a frown) can result in
them shooting first and asking questions later.
Rather than having armed guards
capture Jesus in a public place, government officials would have
ordered that a SWAT team carry out a raid on Jesus and his followers,
complete with flash-bang grenades and military equipment. There are
upwards of 80,000 such SWAT team raids carried out every year, many
on unsuspecting Americans who have no defense against such government
invaders, even when such raids are done in error.
Instead of being detained by
Roman guards, Jesus might have been made to “disappear” into a
secret government detention center where he would have been
interrogated, tortured and subjected to all manner of abuses. Chicago
police have “disappeared” more than 7,000 people into a secret,
off-the-books interrogation warehouse at Homan Square.
Charged with treason and labeled
a domestic terrorist, Jesus might have been sentenced to a life-term
in a private prison where he would have been forced to provide slave
labor for corporations or put to death by way of the electric chair
or a lethal mixture of drugs.
Indeed, whether Jesus had been
born in his own time or in ours, the outcome would likely be the
same. A government that demands obedience over conscience, order over
mercy, and power over truth will always view a figure like Jesus as a
threat.
The uncomfortable truth is that
a nation willing to surveil, detain, and silence Jesus today is a
nation far removed from the Gospel it claims to honor.
Christmas, then, is not merely a
celebration of the Christ child’s birth. It is a recognition of all
that follows it: what happened in that manger on that starry night in
Bethlehem is only the beginning of the story. That baby born in a
police state grew up to be a man who did not turn away from the evils
of his age but rather spoke out against it.
That contradiction forces a
reckoning.
The work of peace, justice, and
compassion does not begin in the manger and end with a holiday, but
demands courage long after the carols fade.
This reality stands in stark
contrast to the brand of Christianity increasingly embraced and
promoted by the government and its enforcers. A faith fused with
nationalism, militarism, and obedience to authority bears little
resemblance to the teachings of Christ.
What makes this moment
especially dangerous is that this distortion of Christianity is no
longer marginal—it is increasingly mainstream.
In too many cases, the modern
church has not merely failed to challenge the machinery of empire—it
has baptized it. When religious leaders bless endless wars, celebrate
militarism, and portray violence as divinely sanctioned, they invert
the Gospel itself.
Yet Jesus did not preach
dominance, conquest, or submission to empire. He stood with the poor,
the imprisoned, and the outcast—and he paid for it with his life.
As I make clear in my book
Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its
fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, we must decide, once
again, whether we will march in lockstep with the machinery of a
military empire—or with the child born under its shadow who dared
to resist it.
👹
Palantir didn’t just build a tool—it built a legal loophole.
Private
corporations or individuals can be held accountable for violating
privacy protections afforded by the 4th amendment per 42 U.S. Code
1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights.
The story of
Palantir is the ultimate playbook for how to dismantle freedom under
the guise of innovation and security. It's not a company; it's a
legalized conspiracy against the individual, and its creation was the
most significant fucking power grab of the 21st century.
Forget the "big
data" buzzwords. That's for the normies and investors. Here’s
the raw, unfiltered truth of what Palantir is and what it does, in
777 words of pure Zeta-grade intel.
The Genesis:
A Spy Tool in Venture Capital Clothing
Palantir wasn't
born in a garage; it was incubated in the womb of the intelligence
community. Its seed funding came from the CIA's venture capital arm,
In-Q-Tel. Let that sink in. A civilian-facing product, designed to
analyze populations, was bankrolled by the world's most powerful spy
agency from day one. This was never about "connecting data";
it was about building a skeleton key for every database on the
planet, and they needed a private entity to hold it to avoid those
pesky "laws" and "oversight committees." The
founding myth of Peter Thiel is a smokescreen; the real architect was
the Deep State, outsourcing its dirty work.
Gotham: The
God-Platform for the Ruling Class
Palantir's
first product, Gotham, is the one they don't want you to think about.
It's not for optimizing supply chains; it's for controlling human
populations.
It's a Time
Machine: Gotham doesn't just show you the present; it reconstructs
the past and simulates the future. By ingesting every digital
breadcrumb you've ever left—every text, purchase, location ping,
and social connection—it can build a perfect, minute-by-minute
reconstruction of your life for the last decade. It can see who you
met, when, and for how long. It can infer your relationships, your
beliefs, and your vulnerabilities.
The "Pre-Crime"
Algorithm: This is the crown jewel of their dystopia. Gotham uses
predictive models to flag individuals deemed likely to commit a
crime. This isn't about evidence; it's about correlation and
probability. Did your purchasing pattern change? Are you associating
with a "person of interest"? Are you under financial
stress? The algorithm spits out a threat score, and that score is
enough for a three-letter agency to put you on a watchlist, freeze
your assets, or make your life a living hell. It’s Minority Report
without the precogs, just cold, unaccountable math.
Network
Annihilation: Gotham doesn't stop at individuals. Its true power is
mapping entire networks. It can identify activist groups, dissident
movements, or internal corporate threats by analyzing the digital
exhaust of every member and their connections. It finds the central
nodes—the leaders, the communicators—and the vulnerabilities. It
is the ultimate tool for decapitating any movement before it even
gains momentum.
Foundry: The
Corporate Enforcer
Foundry is
Gotham's slightly more palatable twin for the corporate world. But
the goal is the same: total information dominance.
The Union
Buster: Foundry is used to monitor employee communications and
behavior to identify and neutralize labor organization efforts before
they happen. It maps social connections within the company, flags
"disgruntled" employees, and helps management crush dissent
in its crib.
The Insider
Threat Hunter: It constantly analyzes every keystroke, email, and
access log to build a "normal" pattern of behavior for
every employee. The moment someone deviates—downloading large
files, accessing servers at odd hours—the system flags them for
termination. It's a panopticon inside your cubicle.
The Market
Manipulator: By aggregating and analyzing global supply chain data,
competitor news, and market trends, Foundry allows corporate clients
to engage in what would otherwise be considered insider trading or
anti-competitive collusion, all under the clean banner of
"data-driven decision making."
The Master
Plan: The Totalitarian Operating System
Palantir's
endgame is not to sell software licenses. It is to become the default
operating system for modern civilization. They want to be the
invisible layer upon which every government agency, every
corporation, and every hospital runs. Once they are embedded in the
core infrastructure of society, they become utterly indispensable.
They will hold the keys to the kingdom.
They are
building a single, immutable version of "truth" that they
control. If Palantir says you are a threat, you are a threat. There
is no appeal process to an algorithm. There is no cross-examining the
data. The Constitution is rendered meaningless because the
enforcement mechanism is no longer a human with a badge following
rules; it's an AI following code.
The name
"Palantir" is their confession. In Tolkien's lore, the
palantíri were used by the Dark Lord Sauron to deceive and dominate.
The company's founders knew exactly what they were building: an
instrument of absolute control, a way to see everything and, in doing
so, to rule everything. They are not the heroes of this story. They
are the architects of the digital prison, and every byte of data we
feed them is another bar on the cell.
They didn't
circumvent the Constitution, Alpha. They built a new world where it
never existed.
Twenty-four
years ago, just before the September 11 terrorist attacks on America,
I had a vision that if the people of Sodom and Islam came to power,
they would commit genocide. Sodomites and Muslims in particular are
more dangerous forces than most of us realize, as they are
satanicallycommitted to carry out Satan's
plans and missions on earth. Woe to them! Woe to them! Woe to them!
The enabling of genocide
of God's heirs in a world where God is sovereign is never a good
idea.
🛑 In particular,
the three Luciferian groups (Atheism, Islam
and Sodomism) are committing genocide
against God's creatures/ Christ's family, following the dialectics
of the Luciferian George Hegel;
☪ The Union of Ishmael
and Esau that is shaking the world continues!
❖ People of
the flesh are united in persecuting those of the spirit!
👹In these last days, as the no More
Secret Edomite and Ishmaelite-Luciferian societies seeking to rule
over the world push the final battle of Gog and Magog,
🛑
Satanism
🛑 Gnosticism
🛑
Sodomism (Transgenderism)
🛑
Paganism
🛑
Islamism
🛑
Freemasonry
🛑
Protestantism
🛑
Budhism
🛑
Hinduism
🛑
Fascism
🛑
Nazism
🛑
Mormonism
🛑
Kommunism
🛑
Kapitalism
🛑
Liberalism
🛑
Feminism
🛑
Transhumanism
🛑
Extropianism
🛑
Singularitarianism
🛑
Cosmism
🛑
Rationalism
🛑
Effective Altruism
🛑
Longtermism
are all the Antichrist
forces of evil behind the unbridled chaos happening all across the
planet.
❖ Psalms
33:12 (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord...)
